Seems like the cryogenic upper stage had less performance than planned and the burn went longer to compensate? In the webcast it was also mentioned that burn to depletion was used - is this pre-planned?https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1153236180709904384 …
-
0:39 -
Antwort an @Cosmic_Penguin
@isro chief just stated that#GSLVM111MK1 Performed well... And#Chandrayan2 is placed in better than expected orbit ... So I think all was in performance margin ... And cryogenic stage burned longer than planned...1 Antwort 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir
Antwort an @milind_kawli @isro
That's affirmative from the result's point of view.
03:18 - 22. Juli 2019
0 Antworten
0 Retweets
1 Gefällt mir
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.