Noticed a minor deviation in the flight path towards the end
Seems like the cryogenic upper stage had less performance than planned and the burn went longer to compensate? In the webcast it was also mentioned that burn to depletion was used - is this pre-planned?https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1153236180709904384 …
0:39
-
-
-
I think what you mean wasn't the flightpath (like in Arianespace webcasts) but the time vs. relative velocity graph. Here we saw a small underperformance, which was compensated by the burn to depletion apparently.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
@isro chief just stated that#GSLVM111MK1 Performed well... And#Chandrayan2 is placed in better than expected orbit ... So I think all was in performance margin ... And cryogenic stage burned longer than planned... -
That's affirmative from the result's point of view.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.