Listen to the other expert, not @SFPDChief (“If we’re going to let people out of jail then let us be there to prevent crime before they commit them next time”). Other expert: “No bail has contributed to violence with felons being released on no bail or on GPS.”https://twitter.com/SFPDChief/status/1407745539332927490 …
-
2:20 -
Replying to @TheMarinaTimes @SFPDChief
No cash bail is w disaster. A disaster. Anyone who thinks it’s a good idea needs to sit in a courtroom. 20+ open cases (can’t even make through the doors wo help) and the person gets released. Can’t do the bare minimum, hundreds of chances, picks up new case, released.
2 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @melG679
And having cash bail wasnt working either it just overcrowded the jails and overworked the court system. At least this way poor presumed innocent people don't have to sit in jail while the rich can get out because they have money for bail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CortezAl3x
In order for a poor presumed innocent person to sit in jail for a violent crime like murder (bc before this LA and SF were releasing people left and right unless they were repeat offenders) there has to be probable cause for an arrest. No one is sitting in custody w no evidence
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @CortezAl3x
Against them. You have to put 10% down for bail. And if we really want to make it fair bc that’s what we are concerned w, I’m fine w just keeping everybody in custody. Bc the new way is a hell of a lot worse than what we were doing before
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679
the court system doesnt agree with you. poor people can't even afford the 10%! there's probable cause for arrest, but the whole point of being in jail is to hold you till your court date. I think youre confusing jail with prison where you go after sentencing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CortezAl3x
Well actually,
@GeorgeGascon@LADAOffice in the humphries case set an insane bail amount.@chesaboudin@SFDAOffice appealed it, which is how we got the humphries decision. The humphries is NOT no cash bail. It says you have to take the persons financial circumstances into acct.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GeorgeGascon and
Exactly! So if youre to poor you don't pay bail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CortezAl3x @GeorgeGascon and
No, if you’re poor now, in certain cases where bail would be set at some amt, it’s now NO bail at all and you’re sitting in custody bc you’re a repeat offender. Now it depends on the judge and in SF, they just let everyone out, but that is one of the things that’s happening.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't see anything wrong with that. At least now theyre prioritizing who actually deserves to be in jail, a shoplifter isn't a priority like a murderer or rapist.
-
-
Replying to @CortezAl3x @GeorgeGascon and
A shoplifter isn’t sitting in jail. It’s not an at least. That hasn’t been happening in LA or SF for the last decade. FFS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



Not political,
politics and ICE
Queen of the SCO 