This tweet comparing right-wing YouTube to Logan Paul's travel vlogs has generated some debate. Here's a quick thread elaborating on what I meant.https://twitter.com/ContraPoints/status/949189978206162944 …
-
-
The question debate organizers should ask themselves is: who are we choosing to put before an audience? What ideas are we giving a voice to?
Show this thread -
The idea that hosting a Nazi discussion stream with 10,000 viewers is politically neutral is about as plausible as the idea that vlogging a suicide corpse raises awareness for mental health.
Show this thread -
(I totally agree that
@DickCoughlan calling Richard Spencer a rotten spunk smudge would have improved the stream 500 fold.)https://twitter.com/GPSolomon/status/949452130074624006 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you suppose that leftists disown those who actively try to promote our ideas and combat the worst ideas of society? Isn’t that counter productive? Shouldn’t we be supporting people who are willing to fight for what is right?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Pakman did it. And he did a good job. And as far as I know most of his following saw it for what it was.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah and the only incentive is apparently "defend your ideas!" and not getting paid it's a no-brainer why assuming a SJW would show up didn't work out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or we'd just shitpost about "winning debates" and become indistinguishable from the right.
-
Oh so like destiny/his fans?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And rightly so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com
stream. Come one, come all, hear what the Nazi has to say.