Business email: info@contrapoints.com
This tweet comparing right-wing YouTube to Logan Paul's travel vlogs has generated some debate. Here's a quick thread elaborating on what I meant.https://twitter.com/ContraPoints/status/949189978206162944 …
Show this thread
-
I say all this, by the way, as someone who has until recently been a sometime participant, though not host, in debate streams with some highly questionable people.
Show this thread
stream. Come one, come all, hear what the Nazi has to say.I don't think debates are bad, but I think that some people are too vile to be included in these high-profile discussions. It's hard to make the judgment call where exactly to draw the line (esp with so much vileness on YouTube). But Spencer is clearly over the line.
-
-
When I see leftists reacting to Warski's stream as if the problem was "it was an unbalanced debate, there should have been more leftists!" I kind of cringe. We all know a leftist who did a stream with Spencer would be disowned by half of lefty Twitter overnight.
Show this thread -
The question debate organizers should ask themselves is: who are we choosing to put before an audience? What ideas are we giving a voice to?
Show this thread -
The idea that hosting a Nazi discussion stream with 10,000 viewers is politically neutral is about as plausible as the idea that vlogging a suicide corpse raises awareness for mental health.
Show this thread -
(I totally agree that
@DickCoughlan calling Richard Spencer a rotten spunk smudge would have improved the stream 500 fold.)https://twitter.com/GPSolomon/status/949452130074624006 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it's less about being too vile, and more about having the proper opposition imo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.