Hitchens was never particularly adept at forming good arguments. He just happened to excel at presenting bad arguments.
-
-
-
He also put a very charming, inviting face on a lot of reactionary impulses. Even many leftists felt the pull. There're probably lessons to be learned here...
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not exactly. SJW's Express out rage at nearly every possible opportunity over the most minuscule of things. Irrationally versus rationally.
-
That sounds like a distinction that’s entirely reliant on what you, personally, already care about beforehand. If you already think the minorities have it too good & we need some white reaction, you’re always gonna disagree with SJW rage no matter how it’s presented.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not a fan of Hitchens, but the difference between selective and seemingly constant outrage is important here. There are some things that we should absolutely be outraged by. Being outraged by too much dilutes the outrage when it's actually necessary. Boy who cried wolf etc etc
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
how about the combination of millions of unwanted comments from random men to millions of random women?
- 3 more replies
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I just enjoyed his casual alcoholism and argumentativness. Makes me not feel so alone about it :p
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com