𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓮 𝓦𝔂𝓷𝓷  💎

Since my detractors claim to care about logic so goddamn much, let's talk about logic.

In my last video, I claimed that fascists often claim not to be fascists.

The best way to render this logically would be "there is some x such that x is a fascist and x denies being a fascist"

i.e., ∃x(Fx & Dx) where F means "is a fascist" and D means "denies being a fascist."

Another vaguely plausible interpretation would be "for every x, if x is a fascist then x denies being a fascist," i.e., ∀x(Fx → Dx)