Business email: info@contrapoints.com
yes, the person who made this was over-zealous w the circling, but the antecedent of the 1st "they" is clearly the singular "another person"
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
exactly. it's about hostility to gender non-conformity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
God this man makes me so ashamed of my University >.>
-
Well then quit, please
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm gonna start calling him Chuck now. He's too ideologically motivated for me to indulge this insistence of his that he be called "Jordan".
-
Personally I'm going with fuckweasel but I don't want to dictate how you express yourself
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh shit. This cultural Marxist conspiracy goes back way further than we could've imagined.pic.twitter.com/cNvxOXoJGq
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is out of context/intellectually dishonest. He has no problem with they, them, or with he or she. He's means https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:List_of_protologisms/third_person_singular_gender_neutral_pronouns …
-
Posting strictly for the sake of honest discourse. You keep doing your thing and being awesome.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.