It's about signaling that transgender people are burdensome and not worth supporting.
-
-
-
Trump is doing this not to make the military more efficient but to get a populist bigotry boost as his reputation is falling apart.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
[Anita Sarkeesian voice] It's both possible and even necessary to support soldiers while also being critical of our imperialistic military.
-
Omg, the self-described and revered video making genderfuck has retweeted me! I... am the Chosen One! I am... GOD!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Definitely, but the way the discourse is being presented in liberal media does lean heavily on thus reinforcing the exceptionalism myth
-
It's up to you to try and keep the discourse focused on the actual core of the problem without relying on patriotic rhetoric, goodlcuk
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We know Nick, serving is not mandatory its a choice' and every choice comes with personal beliefs, very few do it in support of imperialism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you exclude a group from society's institutions you're only otherizing them. Hence any exclusion should be fought.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In my mind it's about opposing imperialism and the military while also opposing the bigotry behind the ban rather than the ban itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe trans people, like all oppressed people, will be a part of/leaders of that revolution
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com