𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓮 𝓦𝔂𝓷𝓷  💎

Ok so I'm not a psychologist but the way I understand science is that we use models to explain phenomena. So the concept of "gender" is 1/

Part of a framework used to explain human sexuality, a model that could very well "compete" with other models. It just turns out it's /2

More useful than other models. It's an interpretation of reality, one based on an amalgamation of research. It's as if you are asking for /3

Definitive proof of divisions in the history of art. The correct answer is "prove that the current interpretation of sexuality is valid" /4

Sure enough perhaps the model has flaws, but it's not something you can just dismiss as false because you disagree with out of it.

But the current model of gender is all about expression and activities you're involved in, which would be classified as personality.

But because of current 'gender theory', and your gender expression doesn't have to be the 'same' as your biological sex, we get people. . .

. . who say they are Non-binary, a gender and a bunch of whacked out shit. So I say, get rid of it. You have a biological sex. . .