I've never actually heard a trans/NB/GNC person say "you're a bigot if you don't sleep with me" or anything close.
-
-
The framing should be "consider why you'd categorically rule out trans people," and I grant it's sometimes presented more aggro than that
-
"you're transphobic if you won't sleep with trans people" is not a good way to put it. And I'm sure it's sometimes put that way.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It seems unhealthy to coerce and guilt someone if they just don't feel attraction to trans or nonbinary people.
-
And to some/many people biological reproduction with their partner is important. Which as current medical science stands isn't possible.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
i see both argued. the latter is often equated with the former, hence not being as widespread as perceived, but still a problem.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
important difference
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But how do we separate the two? The reality for many people is that love/attraction is a hybrid of emotion and physicality.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
This is why you need to make more videos and Riley shouldn't. Your words are clearer and make valuable distinctions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com