Business email: info@contrapoints.com
Of course, it's technically correct. You can admire beauty w/o sexual attraction. But it seems like an awful lot of protesting on this point
All hot takes are superfluous, just read and bask in the glory.https://thegoldenone.se/2017/07/06/male-beauty/amp/ …
-
-
-
There's a very specific, non-gay way to watch 300. Hands have to be always at least at a 10 cm distance from the crotch and the nipples.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
I hear his voice in my head when I read this, that can't be good
-
Don't be too hard on yourself. You can't truly appreciate his work without his voice
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh God he writes?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what am i supposed to even focus on
-
the parantheses around freudian? the admission that he'll never be as handsome as james bond?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As an ace, I was totally prepared to defend non-sexual aesthetic appreciation, but after reading that, dude sounds super-gay. Poor guy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.