There was one point made raised by the @bear_ing's new video about me which I'll respond to here—
-
-
Replying to @ContraPoints @bear_ing
Bearing (and a number of other critics) say we should only have two sex categories because there are only two sexual reproductive roles.
8 replies 0 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints @bear_ing
It is true that there are only two sexual reproductive roles (I don't know of any condition that causes humans to produce both sperm & eggs)
7 replies 0 retweets 52 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints @bear_ing
However when we say that someone is biologically male or female, we're generally describing a cluster of anatomical and physiological
2 replies 0 retweets 60 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints @bear_ing
characteristics (hormones, genitals, secondary sex chars), not just a role in reproduction.
6 replies 0 retweets 58 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints @bear_ing
So, when we use "sex" to refer to these clusters, it is incorrect to say there are only two discrete sexes, when many people exist in the
4 replies 1 retweet 57 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints @bear_ing
Can't this same phenomenon be more easily explained under the Law of Family Resemblance instead of infinite genders?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
we're talking about sex, not gender. No one is proposing infinite sexes that I know of.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com