I'm really glad I didn't leave a comment on my last video with any kind of "interpretation" or "what it means" kind of thought. Because—
-
-
Saul is completely ineffectual, and every single leftist has been him at one time or another. I definitely have. We all have.
-
The big debate is whether Saul's mistake is 1) that he doesn't walk out of the room immediately or 2) that he doesn't use better rhetoric
-
I think either would be better than what he does.
-
There's a reason why it comes as a big relief when Abigail Cockbane shows up. Cockbane is a bit villainous herself be she doesn't take shit.
-
If Cockbane debated Fritz nothing productive would happen but at least she wouldn't be bullied. She'd interrupt, accuse, get real ugly.
-
But what she does is leave immediately. She won't even consider walking into the room with Fritz. And that works out better for her TBH
-
So if there's a "lesson" I guess it's that we have to work on not being Saul. Maybe that means walking out of rooms like that.
-
Or maybe it means developing anti-Fritz rhetorical strategies. But I honestly don't yet know what those are.
-
I can't say I've ever seen someone in debate with a Pepe-grinning fascist come out on top. But if it could be done it'd be worth doing.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
like i put its the narrative debate style , or as overton window , but i got much more intrigue with the cypher , Lovecraftian vibe
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com