Business email: info@contrapoints.com
"We want fair and just treatment by the dominant group," vs. "We want to banish/extirpate all subordinate groups."
This is so common and so wrong: "I'm not a white nationalist because it's identity politics, just like feminism and BLM."
-
-
-
(Maybe a stronger statement of the identity politics position is "We want to end the dominant/subordinate dynamic altogether.")
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
literally the entire point of "trigger warnings" is to apply a "trigger *warning*". it's in the goddamn name. everything else is w/e
-
the point is to recognize ptsd, w/ rape survivors discussing sexual violence or iraq war vets coming back to school discussing war
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if that did happen, i agree it's egregious and hypocritical. however, everyone in my circles at least were sympathetic to colbert.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i was more addressing the idea that lefties want "authoritative action". trigger warnings aren't a call to censorship, virtually by def.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
trying not to fuck up the threading. i think the etymology exposes a certain intellectual dishonesty to the whole idea, misrep. of ideas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An identity doesn't validate the politics attached to it. Just because it's identity politics doesn't make it good politics...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.