Business email: info@contrapoints.com
But that's not the world we're in.
In a world where gender didn't force you into roles there'd be no point in calling yourself "genderqueer." You'd just be another person.
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well do try, but it's a stance of self affirmation and resistance to it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok how do we do that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't fit gender stereotypes -- pretty much no-one does -- but that's unrelated to me having a binary sex I'm comfortable being.
-
I think there are varying degrees of discomfort with binary identity. At some (unspecified for now) point I think it becomes worth IDing
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I might be missing something semantically... I thought genderqueer was more about feeling comfortable in a body that's not 100% either sex.
-
It can be that. But a lot of (most?) GQ I've talked to are not intersex or on hormones. So it can be more about perception of your body,
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
so does this mean everyone is technically genderqueer, they just may not know it? i'm sorry if i sound like an idiot x
-
In a sense, everyone's a little bit. But to identify as GQ usually you have to get to a point where it's having a significant impact
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.