It's a basic presupposition of society that's blurted out dogmatically as a cudgel against certain queer people.
-
-
-
Because it's presuppositional, it can never really be argued for. It's not empirical but normative/prescriptive.
-
The "arguments" in favor end up being, "you're trying to change the definition of words!" w/ implication that this is sinister or impossible
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is 'if you can be transgender why can't this white woman ID as black?' the new 'same sex marriage will lead to humans marrying dogs'?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And "I identify as an attack helicopter" is the new slippery slope.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
gooby plssssssssssssssssssss that is to say "I agree"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only silver lining about this is that they've given up on gay marriage as a never-going- backwards issue. This too will pass...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com