no, I just think it's wrong to pretend that it has a better record of success than debate
-
-
Replying to @ContraPoints @EcclestonEnt
You literally just praised the success of violence against fascism - but only when the US did it.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Is violence wrong because it doesn't work or because it might not work if it's disorganised???
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @Hbomberguy @EcclestonEnt
It's wrong until civilization fails, i.e. tyranny or war
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContraPoints @EcclestonEnt
So a country declaring war on fascism legitimises violence against fascism?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Hbomberguy @EcclestonEnt
it's not that e.g. communist street violence wasn't legitimate. In retrospect it clearly was
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContraPoints @EcclestonEnt
So violence is only legit once it's got too bad or you can magically prove it definitely will?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Hbomberguy @EcclestonEnt
well, what's the alternative? To take arms at the first whiff of rightism?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints @EcclestonEnt
Rightism and Fascism are different things, oh my goodness, leave the right wing alone
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
and answer the question - how would a commie prove to you it was gonna get bad without history?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
there is no way to know for sure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com