If the traditional gender/social order is natural & innate, why is ideology such a threat to it, and why does it need so much defending?
-
-
Replying to @ContraPoints
You do know that is the same argument creationists use against evolution?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FullMetalBudgie
False equivalence. Creationists deny the way things are, not the way things could be.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContraPoints
Strawman. I had not equivalented the hypothesis, just the argument
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FullMetalBudgie
but the hypothesis affects the validity of the argument. If a thing is immutable, it shouldn't need so much propping up.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @FullMetalBudgie
I mean the traditional social order ought to be immutable if it's natural and innate
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContraPoints
Why should it? I don't see something natural and innate as immutable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @FullMetalBudgie
well a thing's being supposedly natural is often adduced to oppose efforts to change it
5:44 PM - 7 Dec 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com