Hey guys here's my thoughts about press coverage of me primarily focusing on "deradicalizing the alt-right." Deradicalizing is part of my work, maybe even the most important thing I've done. I'm grateful for the recognition. But I don't want to be pigeonholed either. Short thread
-
-
The anti-Alt Right project was my main project in 2017, and at the time a lot of people told me I was obsessed with a weird but harmless Internet thing. So it is nice to be recognized now for that work, which is honestly probably the most important work I've done so far.
Show this thread -
It's being covered now because there have been recent mass murders inspired by the alt-right. I wish this was being covered in 2017, and I wish it hadn't taken terrorist attacks for this to be taken seriously, but better late than never.
Show this thread -
It's also not necessarily journalists' fault that it's only being covered now. I talked to a journalist yesterday who told me that he'd wanted to do a story about it in 2017, but the editors weren't having it, again bc of this (dangerously wrong) perception that it was just memes
Show this thread -
That said, I do worry about being primarily known for work that I expect will soon become irrelevant (the alt-who???). My content has already started to move on, and recovering edgelords have long been a minority of my audience.
Show this thread -
So basically, please don't drag journalists for covering the deradicalization story. If there's a profile/interview/podcast with me, it's because I agreed to do it. If I ever decide to fully distance myself from the deradicalization role, I will stop agreeing to these things.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com