YouTuber, ex-philosopher 
Business email: info@contrapoints.com
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Hey guys here's my thoughts about press coverage of me primarily focusing on "deradicalizing the alt-right." Deradicalizing is part of my work, maybe even the most important thing I've done. I'm grateful for the recognition. But I don't want to be pigeonholed either. Short thread
A lot of you saw that drunk comment I posted on Kat's video where I complain that journalists only want to talk to me if they're running stories that center the feelings of racist men. That is often I problem I encounter, but I was exaggerating somewhat.
In a profile of me that's mostly about me, it makes sense to mention the deradicalizing work, and in that case I don't feel like I'm being cast as merely a useful resource for recovering bigots.
The anti-Alt Right project was my main project in 2017, and at the time a lot of people told me I was obsessed with a weird but harmless Internet thing. So it is nice to be recognized now for that work, which is honestly probably the most important work I've done so far.
It's being covered now because there have been recent mass murders inspired by the alt-right. I wish this was being covered in 2017, and I wish it hadn't taken terrorist attacks for this to be taken seriously, but better late than never.
It's also not necessarily journalists' fault that it's only being covered now. I talked to a journalist yesterday who told me that he'd wanted to do a story about it in 2017, but the editors weren't having it, again bc of this (dangerously wrong) perception that it was just memes
That said, I do worry about being primarily known for work that I expect will soon become irrelevant (the alt-who???). My content has already started to move on, and recovering edgelords have long been a minority of my audience.
So basically, please don't drag journalists for covering the deradicalization story. If there's a profile/interview/podcast with me, it's because I agreed to do it. If I ever decide to fully distance myself from the deradicalization role, I will stop agreeing to these things.
The most important thing you did for me (and probably others) was to be visible, trans, and intelligent. Cis people take that for granted that they can see themselves in everything. Having a trans woman be both put together and the smartest person in the room was huge for me.
Me as well, we've got to play by more of their rules in order to break them! I talk about anything I experience from a place of resilience. I do not always get to show the internal struggle but the way our culture is set up, many others don't either unfortunately.
Your content is so damn good you go beyond that. Every video I watch like 3 times cause theres just so much effort and you have such a nice voice to listen to. Just doing sth thinking hm lets listen to beauty again and then I end up alt tabbing anyway cause the presentation is 
Yo same I re-watch the videos to reexamine the set and take a look at the discourse in a different way. Also I love her voice too, that laugh 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
