If you're a cis journalist who writes about trans people, you have effectively appointed yourself our representative to the public, at a time when we are fighting for the most basic form of societal recognition. We didn't vote for you, but here you are.
-
Show this thread
-
If you aren't abnormally arrogant, you might expect some sense of humility & responsibility to the group you're representing to come along with that. If a large percentage of your "constituents" are critical of your work, you'd think that'd be a cause for reflection & self-doubt.
3 replies 51 retweets 1,087 likesShow this thread -
To instead reflexively insist, "No, it's the transgenders who are wrong," to block your critics, to go about publicly discrediting them—it's such an abuse of the position you've appropriated for yourself.
1 reply 46 retweets 1,084 likesShow this thread -
But of course, the cis representatives get to throw their tantrum. Their basic capability as rational agents is never questioned.
2 replies 59 retweets 1,184 likesShow this thread -
Whereas if you're trans & you want your own voice in the conversation about you, you're always ten decibels or one heated tweet away from being cast as a triggered tr*nny. You have to have the emotional dynamism of a black stone effigy of Ramses II.
24 replies 103 retweets 1,711 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com
