I'm a conscientious objector to Twitter callouts. I think the less tweeted the better. But since my @verge profile is out and I'm already dragging Jesse Singal in print, here's a very Nuanced & Rational thread about why he's not a good commentator on trans issues.
-
Show this thread
-
Backstory: Singal is a cis journalist who's written several pieces on trans issues. Trans Twitter generally regards him as a supervillain, & they generally regard me as his alibi since I defended him from various accusations after he wrote a puff piece on me for NYMag last year.
1 reply 15 retweets 571 likesShow this thread -
If you're coming to this from Singal's side of the story you'll have heard that he's simply done his journalistic duty, bringing rational freespeechy nuance to difficult & complex issues surrounding trans children, for which he's been ruthlessly defamed by transsexual maniacs.
1 reply 10 retweets 501 likesShow this thread -
Let's concede that many of the typical accusations are unsubstantiated or hyperbolic: that he's a TERF, a chaser, an egg, that he "wants trans people dead," that he's a pulsating hive of pure malevolence—you know, Twitter-speak for "he kinda fucked up."
7 replies 9 retweets 530 likesShow this thread -
The hyperbole of these accusations kept me in the dark about Singal longer than I should have been. In fact I don't feel I need to rescind anything I previously said about him. I said he's not a TERF (someone who cloaks transphobia in radical feminism). Well he's not.
4 replies 12 retweets 483 likesShow this thread -
I do wish there were more of a commitment around here to being precise with callouts, to limiting accusations to what is strictly speaking true, instead of this raw expressionism. It's a distraction from what is *demonstrably* wrong with Singal. So here's the real T.
3 replies 27 retweets 759 likesShow this thread -
This is messy so strap in. [cw transphobia] Singal was inspired to begin his career as a cis commentator on trans people when he read cis journalist Alice Dreger's book "Galileo's Middle Finger," a defense of Blanchardism (a defamatory quack theory of MtF transsexuality).
2 replies 27 retweets 535 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ContraPoints
i havent read Galileo's Middle Finger, but I read Dreger's NIH paper summarizing what had happened. From her telling she wasn't making a judgment on the validity of autogynephilia as a theory but merely documenting the treatment of that Northwestern prof. Is that true?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To all appearances she endorses the theory, including the notion that its detractors suffer from wounded narcissistic rage, which is right there in the book.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Business email: info@contrapoints.com