If you're still struggling to understand the tidal wave of ridiculous, point-proving responses to this tweet, try analyzing through DiAngelo's rule: "the question is not 'did racism take place?' but rather 'how did racism manifest in this situation?'"https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1222267655014535168 …
-
-
I recently had the Motte and Bailey fallacy introduced to me and it's rather amazing how often these people utilize it. If you're unfamiliar with it, it's worth a look.pic.twitter.com/tJe9MmH62O
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This seems like the general pitfall of having un-falsifiable beliefs. Any and all avenues lead to affirmation of the belief. All subsequent sates+actions pairs lead to the same node in the epistemic state-machine.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
But the most important thing is the racism is always there, and must be there, or the entire theory starts unravelling.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The responses seemed pretty evenly divided between failing to grasp the point and bad faith. A discouraging mix to deal with.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.