Philosophers are the militant vegans of intellectual activity.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
omg don’t do this to ur self
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a brilliant little paper, but, er, a few people have written a few things about it since. McGrew & McGrew, many others...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gonna be fun when you begrudgingly admit you don't know what this is at all and actually read the paper three days from now!
-
Didn't you hear, Gettier was an SJW standpoint theorist who didn't believe in the correspondence theory of truth?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've never seen someone corncob themself over Gettier. Thanks for bringing some joy to the new decade
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What wrong with Geiter cases? Its a nifty bit of epistemology that exposes a gap between justification and truth in cases of double luck. You can attempt to fix it with a 4th condition, or replace justification. Or abandon definitions with family resemblance Wittgenstein style
-
They're fringe corner cases and this is Twitter where economy of expression is required.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems like both cases involve an illegitimate equivalency between "has strong evidence for" and "is justified in believing that". Having a verbal "assurance" from someone isn't real justification
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
