The most common reaction I get when explaining Social Justice Theory is that they can't really mean that. I must have it wrong. Well, sometimes, sure. Even showing it to people in black and white often triggers this reaction, as though it must have some deeper, subtler meaning.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I have a Social Justice education book here, Is Everyone Really Equal?, Sensoy and DiAngelo. I just opened it kind of at random to give you some ideas of what they teach.pic.twitter.com/y4xLds9vx1
Show this thread -
Note that explicit reference to using Critical Theory, which we endlessly hear from Social Justice apologists that Social Justice doesn't do. "But the postmodernists..." Yes, them too.pic.twitter.com/dfKjro5b16
Show this thread -
Thumbing through a little more for you. Just flipping through pages, glancing, taking photos of what's there.pic.twitter.com/mHfywNPpbF
Show this thread -
How to ally, and what to do if you're a member of a "dominant" identity group.pic.twitter.com/59NTeqX9pQ
Show this thread -
Don't like books? Here's an infographic for the professional world.pic.twitter.com/vqREMeB8ZZ
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They'll deny it and obfuscate, denigrate you and try to make you look like an evil bad faith actor, will try to decontextualize it and hide their "problematic" beliefs with more palatable platitudes
-
They don't need to do that. They just redefine common words. Especially the ones that may actually trigger actual survivors of actual crimes like rape.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Honest question. .. what ARE they after?
-
Revolutionary redistribution of power and wealth.
-
Revolutionary redistribution of wealth and power to themselves.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly! The only way I've found to be effective to counter SJ ideology is to expose people to what SJW say/do as opposed to engaging in endless discussions which end with them gaslighting you about the magnitude of the problem!! It really really works.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hmm. Problem with 'context' is if you challenge them within their own rabbithole, they'll usually be surrounded by allies. Hence their tendency to rely on 'mobbing'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think I know what you’re Saying, but an example might be helpful here.
New conversation -
-
-
You can give direct examples and they just say the example is irrelevant, a "whataboutism", "not that bad" or a "far fringe view unshared by most within the Soc-Jus movement." They basically never have to answer for what they espouse or can pick and choose.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Especially the "reprogramming most people's minds" part. I ALWAYS knew they were thought police.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Similarly, reading parts of the bible to people can enlighten them to the fact that Christianity is far more than “do unto others...”, which sounds like such a great philosophy. You’d be immoral to be against that!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.