North star for @RoamResearch is users getting compound interest from past work.https://twitter.com/sama/status/1214274052077969408 …
-
-
Similarly, new edits to old notes, block references to old notes
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
When I worked on trustworthiness of Wikipedia, my intuition was to measure how many edits and other authors an author-attributed segment had survived, and then to derive author trust based on the aggregate relative survival. How about measuring node reference rate / active day?
-
I wonder if accessing old nodes should count more. (There's a user-subjective sense of value which is hard to capture.)
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
How will you judge whether Roam is supporting that goal?
I realize this is a tough question, so the rough beginnings of an answer are sufficient (and as always, you never owe answers to unsolicited questions in the first place)