173. Forgiveness is a super dope concept.
It's ok to forgive those assholes. It's really good for you to do. For yourself. For the world.
Don't drink venom to poison them. Hatred and resentment are venom.
Ok to ignore/discount their narratives about you though
U special
U
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
174. Getting overprotective of your beliefs - especially about self trust and self efficacy - can be super super harmful So can believing that X about yourself implies Y when it doesn't. Learn about bucket errors, you're making them, they hurt you.https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EEv9JeuY5xfuDDSgF/flinching-away-from-truth-is-often-about-protecting-the …
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
175. Henry ford is right, which implies there are levels of TRUTH outside of bayesian priors. Bay area rationalist (surrounding LessWrong) don't really grok this as a community, which is why they aren't as creatively generative/agentic as the Post Rats surrounding Ribbonfarm.pic.twitter.com/O4rto9JJAR
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Conaw
If people were accurately confident using bayesian priors, we'd see a lot less successful entrepreneurship (among other risky things). Self-efficacy leads to increased performance and task persistence. Sometimes epistemic rationality is at odds with instrumental rationality
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RobertHaisfield
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceTiago Forte
Dangerous zone - mostly agree w
@fortelabs herehttps://twitter.com/fortelabs/status/1154797219645513728?s=20 …Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je dodan/na,
Tiago Forte @fortelabsMy conclusion from the comments and experience: Any small improvement in decision making you gain from knowing about cognitive biases and mental models is more than counteracted by the loss of trust in your own decision making. You're smarter, but less effective https://twitter.com/fortelabs/status/1154648991671508992 …1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @fortelabs
I wouldn’t go that extreme at all. There’s definitely clear examples of epistemically and instrumental rationality being at odds (and I’d choose being effective more often than not), but they almost certainly support each other more often than not.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @RobertHaisfield @fortelabs
Yeah, the caveat is that I think his statement can be true in early days of learning about cognitive biases - but that you come out stronger when you pass through that valley. Nate Soares' Replacing Guilt series is great work here - extremely useful 4 mehttp://mindingourway.com/confidence-all-the-way-up/ …
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @fortelabs
"every lack of confidence is covered by confidence one meta-level higher in the cognitive chain. The result is something that reads socially as confidence regardless of how much empirical uncertainty I'm under."
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @fortelabs
"Confidence all the way up is what has me dive into the fray to try new things, while others stand on the sidelines bemoaning a high degree of uncertainty It's part of the technique of treat recurring failures as data & training, rather than a signal it's time to feel guilty"
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @fortelabs
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceConor White-Sullivan 🧢
The operative term here is "small improvement" There is in general huge amount of danger in a little knowledge. Confidence all the way up takes time, in developing that, you'll go through periods of doubt that reduce your effectiveness.https://twitter.com/Conaw/status/1213231090132865025?s=19 …
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je dodan/na,
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceConor White-Sullivan 🧢
Great point in this interview is when @DavidDeutschOxf says "A system that is good at error correction will MAKE MORE ERRORS" - and paradoxically this is a very good thing
Like they say in startups - FAIL FAST.
Prophecy is the opposite of knowledge.https://twitter.com/Conaw/status/1212893693021044736?s=20 …
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je dodan/na,
-
-
Just read the confidence all the way up article, fantastic. Great take on how to use a growth mindset and risk to enhance effectiveness and accuracy. Totally agree with the perspective you raised as well about a little knowledge being dangerous.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @RobertHaisfield @Conaw i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Epistemic rationality is good when it you're effective enough that you accurately assess yourself as competent. Take a startup idea where you get others telling you you're wrong. The accurately confident rationalist would take that as feedback, but wouldn't stop all-together.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa - Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.