I'm mostly just giving @fortelabs shit.
Disagree a bit, think Tools matter
As correlary don't think @eggheadio would be doing as well if you only had videos on raw JS, and just told users - hey, you can use React or Angular, but we only teach fundamentals using DOM manipulation
-
-
Implementation details matter, but that’s not what makes BASB interesting. I wouldn’t touch Evernote personally. But that didn’t detract from the value I took away from buying Tiago’s course. It shifted my perspective and directly correlates to my interest in Roam.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Awesome!
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Take it from a historian who studies ideas, tools matter more than we might give credit (considering the context of software competition). Tools can be limiting - much like poverty, isolation, or culture limits/frames the perception of possible - a tool can do the same.
1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @calhistorian @Conaw i sljedećem broju korisnika:
the sapir-whorf hypothesis but for tools to think with (which words are, tbh)
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @amyhoy @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceConor White-Sullivan 🧢
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je dodan/na,
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 @Conaw10. Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is true -- but the effects are far more pronounced for programming languages than for spoken languages. The language you write code in ends up shaping huge parts of you worldview even when you're not programming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity …Prikaži ovu nit1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
programming languages are all more similar than human languages imo. but software with a ui (incl frameworks) is a different story
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @amyhoy @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Might be true, but I've studied Arabic, Spanish, French and German and gotten conversational in each... none of them changed how I saw the world as much as the first 3 months of Ruby, Clojure, or Javascript. Each new programming language I learned had total frame shift.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
i think maybe you haven’t fully internalized how to think like a computer if that’s so. but of course you know how to think like a human with speech.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
the way you break down a programming problem will be pretty much the same no matter what language you use. only the implementation will look different.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Not my experience -- I've seen a lot of people break problems down differently depending on their first programming language. Imperative, Declarative, Functional, Object Oriented, Procedural, Logical each has very diff style -- programmers have accents from native tongue
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.