I don’t think education and knowledge sharing is zero-sum in any way shape or form.
We (@eggheadio) do well in a very crowded knowledge space, for instance.
I applied Tiago’s techniques from BASB to both Notion and now Roam.
The tools are implementation details.
-
-
I'm mostly just giving
@fortelabs shit. Disagree a bit, think Tools matter As correlary don't think@eggheadio would be doing as well if you only had videos on raw JS, and just told users - hey, you can use React or Angular, but we only teach fundamentals using DOM manipulation0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Implementation details matter, but that’s not what makes BASB interesting. I wouldn’t touch Evernote personally. But that didn’t detract from the value I took away from buying Tiago’s course. It shifted my perspective and directly correlates to my interest in Roam.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Awesome!
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Take it from a historian who studies ideas, tools matter more than we might give credit (considering the context of software competition). Tools can be limiting - much like poverty, isolation, or culture limits/frames the perception of possible - a tool can do the same.
1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @calhistorian @Conaw i sljedećem broju korisnika:
the sapir-whorf hypothesis but for tools to think with (which words are, tbh)
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @amyhoy @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceConor White-Sullivan 🧢
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 je dodan/na,
Conor White-Sullivan 🧢 @Conaw10. Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is true -- but the effects are far more pronounced for programming languages than for spoken languages. The language you write code in ends up shaping huge parts of you worldview even when you're not programming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity …Prikaži ovu nit1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
programming languages are all more similar than human languages imo. but software with a ui (incl frameworks) is a different story
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @amyhoy @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Might be true, but I've studied Arabic, Spanish, French and German and gotten conversational in each... none of them changed how I saw the world as much as the first 3 months of Ruby, Clojure, or Javascript. Each new programming language I learned had total frame shift.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Conaw @calhistorian i sljedećem broju korisnika:
i think maybe you haven’t fully internalized how to think like a computer if that’s so. but of course you know how to think like a human with speech.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
None of the programming languages I mentioned teach you to think like a computer. I've written a bit of C -- where I have to think more in terms of memory management -- but again, these offer very different paradigms for modeling the world, data, and action
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.