This isn’t about being on a “side”. It’s about setting a precedent. These social media companies are the new town squares. I think direct calls to violence, libel, and slander should be the only things that should bring about revoked privilges on these platforms.
-
-
Replying to @ConagandaTV @TeamYouTube and
I'm assuming you're not a minority in any way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OuchMyNardz @TeamYouTube and
Being a minority doesn’t equate to competency or the strength of an argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConagandaTV @TeamYouTube and
It provides perspective though. "Violence, libel, or slander" seems like the bare minimum. Your perspective has never experienced the small microaggressions and casual belittling of language, which over the course of a lifetime cause just as much damage as violence could.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OuchMyNardz @TeamYouTube and
It also provides the opportunity to claim offense and stifle legitimate criticism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConagandaTV @TeamYouTube and
I think your middle-ground or gray area on "what's offensive" is too broad and it's dangerous nowadays with how many psychos have guns and have mailed bombs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OuchMyNardz @TeamYouTube and
Psychos have always had the ability to wreak havoc. Dynamite has existed since the 1800s and repeater rifled have existed since the 1850s. Giving up essential liberties for the sake of sagely will lead to you having neither.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConagandaTV @TeamYouTube and
It is our goal in life to leave our society more just and fair than when we entered it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OuchMyNardz @TeamYouTube and
U have a bad view of justice if being able to censor on offense is considered “fairness.” It works fine when the people in power agree with u, but how would u feel with those powers being used by a right wing government to silent ur speech for the sake of “protecting the family”?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConagandaTV @TeamYouTube and
This isnt difficult. Crowders opinion is fine, but his obsession with using bigoted name-calling and profiting off the illusion of the word "fag" is something he shouldn't be allowed to use
@YouTube for.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If there is any commentary that you would recommend that I look at, please provide some. I honestly don’t think we are going to get anywhere, but I apologize if I came across as mean spirited. Hope you have a nice day.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.