I’m not telling u what u should and shouldn’t be offended about. Im saying that your offense does not justify censoring someone. Unless direct calls to violence are made, people should be allowed to speak. You set a bad precedence when offense is the threshold for censorship.
U have a bad view of justice if being able to censor on offense is considered “fairness.” It works fine when the people in power agree with u, but how would u feel with those powers being used by a right wing government to silent ur speech for the sake of “protecting the family”?
-
-
This isnt difficult. Crowders opinion is fine, but his obsession with using bigoted name-calling and profiting off the illusion of the word "fag" is something he shouldn't be allowed to use
@YouTube for. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.