Admittedly, doing trials for most crimes would be more fair. But I'm also not a fan of letting crime go unpunished by lack of resources.
-
-
-
Agreed. And I'm confident we'll find the resources to punish the crimes that truly merit punishment. It's actually a clever "check" when you think about it. Imagine those Founders being so smart.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yes, a feature intended to require DAs prove the accused actually committed the crimes alleged. There's a price to take away someone's freedom. The price should be paid by those trying to revoke it.
-
100%. As I tweeted yesterday, if we're not willing to pay the full cost of a constitutionally compliant prosecution and adjudication to take away someone's freedom, then maybe we shouldn't.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I really think most non-DAs concerned about "letting criminals go" don't realize how small a % of cases are violent crimes & how enormous a majority are non-violent drug charges. DAs think it's good to incarcerate addicts. Fortunately, they are members of a shrinking minority.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.