Collabra: Psychology

@CollabraOA

Open Access journal publishing in psychology, official journal of SIPS (), published by . Tweets by marketing dept. and

Everywhere
Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @CollabraOA

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @CollabraOA

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    10. svi 2019.
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    One more time for those just waking up. Good morning! Apply to be an Associate Editor at !

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    You know that person who writes great reviews/comments? Who you’re always wondering what they think of the latest paper you read (or wrote)? Encourage them to apply to be an Associate Editor at ! All ranks & areas of psych are welcome to apply! We want a diverse team!

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    We’re looking for Associate Editors for , SIPS’s official journal. All areas of psych. No previous editing experience required. Please consider applying & encourage others! To apply, submit CV and 500-word statement here:

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Congratulations to for becoming the new Editor-in-Chief !!!🎉 Looking forward to new innovations and thoughts on publishing high quality psychological research. I plan to publish my research here in the future!

    Poništi
  7. 3. velj

    Congratulations, and welcome all to a great editorial team at Collabra: Psychology!

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Looking for funding to get to ? If you can spend a day (right before SIPS) assessing claims for , apply for one of these US $550 travel grants! Pre-SIPS RepliCATS workshop/grant: SIPS2020 info/registration:

    Poništi
  9. 28. sij

    New Perspective/Opinion from 's & : Why don't self-report measures of self-control and Inhibition tasks substantially correlate?

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    Fynn O. Wöstenfeld, Suhaib Ahmad, Meike Kroneisen, and I just published an article with : showing that the survival processing benefit does not generalize to serial recall

    Poništi
  11. 22. sij

    New from psychology researchers: "Recalling Experiences: Looking at Momentary, Retrospective and Global Assessments of Relationship Satisfaction"

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    A replication of your Conversation electrified?🙂 If so, also pragmatics/discourse journals could like it. But I also suggest which follows a sustainable OA model and is interested in methodologically sound studies (thus also in replications) rather than mere impact

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij

    A new paper of ours is out, which failed to replicate the idea that ("sub-clinical") autistic traits are related to reduced prosocial behaviour. Congrats to on her first paper! In with

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 15. sij

    What are Replicable Aspects of the Broader Autism Phenotype among College Students?

    Poništi
  15. 10. sij

    Under What Conditions Does Prosocial Spending Promote Happiness?

    Poništi
  16. 9. sij

    New original research finds that using smartphone-based studies to conduct Response Time-Based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) works just as well as using desktop computers

    Poništi
  17. 9. sij

    "Together, these results do not corroborate the assumption that processing the word red impairs intellectual performance"

    Poništi
  18. 8. sij

    New Perspective article from 's Jan De Houwer: Conditioning is More Than Association Formation

    Poništi
  19. 8. sij

    Like American kids, Japanese kids delayed gratification + valued the delay more if they believed that their group delayed gratification (+ an outgroup did not) than if they believed that their group did not delay gratification (and an outgroup did)

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. sij

    新年明けましておめでとうございます。 大学院時代に苦労した研究の論文が出ました。満足遅延課題において, 内集団が「待つ」選択をする情報を提示すると, 日本の幼児でも「待つ」選択をする傾向が高くなることを示しました (次へ続く)。

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 3. sij

    Original research report: No Effect of Red on Personality Trait Self-Ratings: Testing for Effects of Font Color

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·