I have loved Grandmasters interviews, but today I realized just how harmful they can also be. I'm having people tell me that Cyclone Mage has >50% winrate in every matchup, because "@firebat said so in Grandmasters." If there was a deck with all >50%, it would be the only deck.
-
How much testing have you done on those match ups?
The data backs it up and that's a lot more useful than any personal testing I could do, judging by VS those matchups haven't become more favourable for the mage over time
-
-
Isn't the whole point of this that with optimal play and different builds those decks don't have those match up spreads?
-
That's the idea but we don't have good evidence for it yet, optimal play goes both ways as well since people often don't play around sea giant well.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.