The “benefits” are BS. Most European and Asian men are not cut, but they have the lowest rates of every problem that circumcision is claimed to prevent. Even if the benefits were real, it doesn’t justify torturing a baby. Watch “elephant in the hospital” on YouTube for more info.
-
-
absurd when an overwhelming majority of men are fine with it. Dressing it up as an issue of consent is absurd, because children can't consent at all, and when you start arguing that they can then you are entering some very dark territory.
-
When someone can't consent to something, someone else has to do it for them, usually their guardians. That's how it is because there is no better way.
-
Lastly, public opposition to circumcision *in real life* is almost always thinly-veiled antisemitism, so for those that have mainly jumped on this issue because of what they've read online, consider that the most prominent champions for your cause are outright bigots.
-
Poisoning the well... nice "If you disagree with X then you're antisemitic" Nice way to avoid arguments and shut people down as bigots if they disagree with you.
-
No shit. My arguments against circumcision have nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the fact it's torture and a wholly unnecessary procedure, and given there are more and more Jews starting to protest it as well, I doubt they could be called antisemitic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My sexual success has been fine thank you, but I do resent the loss of 20,000 nerve endings in my penis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.