Since this comes up a lot, a quick run though of the testable, falsifiable, science that supports a human cause of recent trends in global mean temperature.pic.twitter.com/VfjAuBgQQt
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
We test the predictions:
Stratospheric cooling?
Detectable warming?
OHC increase?
Pinatubo-related cooling?
Space-based changed in IR absorption?
post-2004 continued warming?
With this validated physics, we can estimate contributions to the longer term trends.https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-world/ …
This too is of course falsifiable. If one could find a model system that matches all of the previously successful predictions in hindcasts, and gives a different attribution, we could test that. [Note this does not (yet) exist, but let's keep an open mind].
We can also look at the testable, falsifiable, theories that were tested, and failed.
Solar forcing? Fails the strat cooling test.
Ocean circulation change? Fails the OHC increase test
Orbital forcing? Fails on multiple levels 
If you have a theory that you don't think has been falsified, or you think you can falsify the mainstream conclusions, that's great! We can test that too! (But lots of people have tried this already so expect there to be an answer already).
PS. Actually, it's even a bit harder. Not only would you need to find a theory that does as well as the current theory, but you'd also need to show why the current theory isn't operative.
Can you provide the citations for these and those is the next tweet? Or is there a review that covers all this? I am not disputing anything, I am convinced but I would like to educate myself better.
But it's not long term we are on a long term cooling phasepic.twitter.com/TTuPHvv6Ro
There is no observations that indicate 0.18C per decade warming. Mean global surface energy is 340 Watts per square metre. Mean global solar energy (excludes dark areas) 396.7 watts per square metre. Atmosphere has no absolute zero temperature so darkness retains 50 Wm2. CO2 < 0.pic.twitter.com/Kr1kQehQDt
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.