Climate FeedbackOvjeren akaunt

@ClimateFdbk

Scientists from around the world sorting fact from fiction in climate change media coverage so you know which news to trust.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ClimateFdbk

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ClimateFdbk

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    Non-peer-reviewed manuscript incorrectly claims natural cloud changes explain global warming Many blogs covered this paper without any factchecking (incl. Infowars, Zerohedge, wattsupwiththat, Sputnik, RT, NaturalNews...) Scientists' review:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    This BBC headline has been getting a lot of attention, and is an inaccurate framing of our recent Nature piece. We argue that its misleading when the RCP8.5 emission pathway is used as "business-as-usual". Its not misleading when its described as a worst-case scenario. 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. sij

    Global surface temperatures from 2019 are now out. It was the second warmest year on record for Berkeley Earth, NASA, NOAA, and Cowtan and Way and the third warmest for HadCRUT. 1/4

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    NEW: Around the world, a new breed of shady PR firms is offering professional disinformation services. Fake accounts, trolling, AI-generated articles to manipulate search rankings — it's all available for the right price. A look inside this growing threat:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    With Nov GISTEMP anomalies posted, 2019 is #2 YTD, and this will be 99.9% likely to be the ranking for the full year. - 5th year clearly > 1°C above late 19th C - closes out warmest decade in record

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is an incredible graphics-driven story about climate change in Australia by . It does the near-impossible job of making an intangible & seemingly far-away problem clear and present in a dispassionate way. h/t

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Recommended read by scientists: article shows how temperatures have changed in your lifetime + projections for future change in Australia, incl. regarding heatwaves & bushfires Cc

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. Recommended read by scientists: article shows how temperatures have changed in your lifetime + projections for future change in Australia, incl. regarding heatwaves & bushfires Cc

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Climate scientists slam Ian Plimer for a “biased” & “inaccurate” op-ed on carbon emissions but the paper says he is an 'important voice in the mix'.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. pro 2019.

    I should add, it's a credit to that we scientists now have a medium to collectively call out this bullshit and communicate that to a wider audience.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. pro 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. pro 2019.

    The very curious projections of . The Australian publishes and defends Ian Plimer. Graham Lloyd does a little bit of balance. The comments are rather predictable.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The article by Ian Plimer presents long list of false claims about climate Scientists all rate its credibility as Very Low Request for correction sent to Alan Howe, editors, & Mr. Campbell Reid, News Corp Australia

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. stu 2019.

    It's a sad state of affairs that we have to spend our time striking down mindless babble like this. Thank you for the important work you do!

    Poništi
  16. The article by Ian Plimer presents long list of false claims about climate Scientists all rate its credibility as Very Low Request for correction sent to Alan Howe, editors, & Mr. Campbell Reid, News Corp Australia

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. stu 2019.

    "There are no carbon emissions. If there were, we could not see, because most carbon is black" This goes beyond the usual 'Ian Plimer is dumber than a bag of lukewarm porridge" - to publish this during one of the worst fire seasons ever is sick. Utterly disgraceful,

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    New York Times op-ed by Eugene Linden claiming that scientists underestimated climate change found to lack supporting evidence Read the detailed analysis: review by @SKPraetorius et al

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. stu 2019.
    Poništi
  20. New York Times op-ed by Eugene Linden claiming that scientists underestimated climate change found to lack supporting evidence Read the detailed analysis: review by @SKPraetorius et al

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    We are hiring a science editor. Join our team and a worldwide community of scientists to help us make the Internet more credible! Apply here:

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·