Conversation

3. The melting of ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica "is overtaking the climate models we use to guide us, and we are in danger of being unprepared for the risks posed by sea level rise." There's a real risk of calamitous 0.5 metre rise by 2040 - 2045.
6
1,029
4. Sea level rise is already an accelerating threat. The IPCC now accepts the possibility of 1.7m of SLR by 2100, but 2m - 7m is possible according to experts. All too much for coastal cities. We may anticipate impacts as early as 2035 - 2045. Thread:
Image
Quote Tweet
Remember: 🇹🇭 Bangkok 🇵🇭 Manila 🇮🇳 Mumbai 🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City 🇮🇩 Jakarta 🇪🇬 Alexandria 🇫🇯 Fiji 🇧🇩 Chittagong 🇰🇮 Kiribati 🇮🇶 Basrah 🇲🇻 The Maldives 🇨🇦 Vancouver 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Skegness 🇸🇨 Seychelles 🇫🇷 La Rochelle 🇮🇩 Surabaya 🇬🇾 Georgetown 🇳🇱 Amsterdam 🇨🇳 Shanghai All underwater by 2035.
Show this thread
4
706
5. "The fact is it just hasn't really sunk in, even in the science community, that we've effectively lost the ice sheets. It's just a matter of time before we see many metres of sea level rise. So, society has to now brace itself for a catastrophe." J. Box
4
913
6. Thread:
Quote Tweet
Greenland: 1. ice sheet now beyond tipping point and expected to completely disappear due to global warming of more than 2°C which will hit around 2030 - 2040 2. ice loss: 1/4 trillion tons per year 3. melt acceleration is exponential 4. sea level rise feedback has begun
Show this thread
Image
2
592
8. A recent tipping reassessment: 'the threshold is closer to 1 °C..which of course we have already passed, and are witnessing the collapse of part of the West Antarctic ice sheet already, and we can’t rule out an irreversible shrinkage of ice in Greenland'
1
497
9. 'In equilibrium.. assuming a central climate sensitivity of 3 ∘C.. 411 ppm.. would imply.. 1.7 ∘C' We're now already at 417 ppm. '1.5 ∘C of warming could come with multi-metre sea level rise by 2300.. and the likely demise of coral reefs..'
1
334
10. A possible error in the Guardian article discussed here. The points I make all stand, however.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @MartinJBern
0.75m - 1m will be hard or (in some cases) impossible to cope with. We can't know exactly how SLR will play out this century, but well over 1m this century or next looks likely to me all things considered. We should be using the precautionary principle.
3
309
11. Another video here from Prof. Jason Box whose quote I paraphrased at the beginning of the thread. Quite remarkable presentation:
Quote Tweet
Replying to @xr_cambridge
This video by @climate_ice is also very worth watching. Eye opening account of how the models are not able to predict ice loss as high as observed from Greenland Ice Sheet, begins at 44 min @ClimateBen youtube.com/watch?v=oAIzJd
13.
Quote Tweet
"Our findings, in comparison to current sea level projections, confront us with a shocking reality: the much larger, already locked-in sea level rise than what ice-sheet models project by end of century, even under high carbon emissions. Our numbers are twice as large ..." twitter.com/climate_ice/st…
Show this thread
Embedded video
0:47
1.5K views
1
33
14. A computer model has been created by researchers that determines the rate at which Greenland’s glacier fronts are melting. It reflects recent observations of an Alaskan glacier front melting up to 100 times as fast as previously assumed.
1
37
Show more replies