You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
45/ diagrams here from NYT https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/24/world/middleeast/douma-syria-chemical-attack-augmented-reality-ar-ul.html …. Bottom left diagram identifies rigging in debris on north part of balcony. During contact, rigging separated from cylinder. They hypothesized screen came down during impact.pic.twitter.com/Epo4T0xbxp
46/ something new: OPCW reports previously unreported "viscous liquid" observed at bedroom scene but shamefully do not report what it was. They said viscous liquid also on gloves on stairs. These gloves showed explosives, insecticides. What does it mean? Why didn't OPCW explain?pic.twitter.com/shF8hYHST7
47/ another oddity. in discussion of Location 4, OPCW report that "round object similar to funnel cap found at Location 2" was observed in Location 4 video but no longer there. However, Location 2 discussion never mentioned funnel cap. What was it? Was it tested?pic.twitter.com/XjIWa6nxIU
48/ another apparent OPCW error. They say that on Apr 7 night, "the presence of a strong odour prevented anyone without respiratory protection from approaching" the third floor and terrace. However, Fadi Abdullah video shows cameraman returning without respiratory protectionpic.twitter.com/BdLNlKTqpA
49/ one of the most remarkable about OPCW's investigation is that they didn't carry out a single autopsy on the dead bodies. People can speculate on whether they died from chlorine, smoke inhalation/asphyxiation or something else, but, without an autopsy, no one knows.
50/ according to OPCW Interim Report (July 6, 2018), OPCW communicated its "intention" to exhume bodies in note verbale NV/ODG/214827/18, and OPCW undertook "preliminary preparations" to do sopic.twitter.com/UjlsXYZ3vC
51/ OPCW visited Locations 2, 4 and hospital on April 21, 25 and May 1. On Apr 26, it notified Syria of intent to exhume by Note Verbale. Syria responded on May 4 and a second time in Note Verbale 57 (prior to August). Interim Report was on July 6.pic.twitter.com/q6x6TbYX5z
52/ Final Report states that Syrian response on May 4 "enumerated conditions to be met in order to conduct the exhumation". OPCW Final: "With due consideration of the time elapsed since the alleged incident, the possibility was eventually not explored any further." Why not?pic.twitter.com/fzguybBQje
53/ Seems crazy that they didn't do any autopsies. I presume that autopsy possibility was still live as of Interim Report on July 6 or they would have closed it off then. When did OPCW stop "exploring" possible autopsy and why? Lack of autopsy creates pointless uncertainty.
54/ so OPCW didn't do any autopsies. Remember when Dr Tarakji of SAMS said that there were no blood samples: "because of a lack of resources, we can’t take blood samples.” http://archive.is/XNTqB That sent alarm bells off for me.pic.twitter.com/MFpbbGAX0h
55/ in early Climate Audit blog about Bre-X fraud https://climateaudit.org/2005/02/06/bre-x-core-and-code/ …, I noted that fraudsters didnt have on-site split core, universal in exploration. They claimed that they needed entire core for sampling. I commented that analysts should have "run for the exit" immediately
56/ lack of blood samples in Douma should have placed everyone on high alert for fraud. OPCW should have checked this out, but failed to do so.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
