跳至內容
如果使用 Twitter 的服務,即表示你同意我們的 Cookies 使用政策。我們和合作夥伴會在全球的營運上使用 Cookie,包括用於分析、個人化及廣告。
  • 首頁 首頁 首頁,目前的頁面。
  • 關於

已儲存的搜尋

  • 移除
  • 在此對話中
    已認證帳戶受保護的推文 @
建議的使用者
  • 已認證帳戶受保護的推文 @
  • 已認證帳戶受保護的推文 @
  • 語言: 正體中文
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
  • 已經擁有帳戶? 登入
    已經擁有帳戶?
    · 忘記了密碼?

    新加入 Twitter?
    註冊
ClimateAudit 的個人資料
Stephen McIntyre
Stephen McIntyre
Stephen McIntyre
@ClimateAudit

Tweets

Stephen McIntyre

@ClimateAudit

climateaudit.org
2015年8月加入

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • 關於
  • 說明中心
  • 條款
  • 私隱政策
  • Cookies
  • 廣告資訊
捨棄
上一頁
下一步

前往他的個人檔案

已儲存的搜尋

  • 移除
  • 在此對話中
    已認證帳戶受保護的推文 @
建議的使用者
  • 已認證帳戶受保護的推文 @
  • 已認證帳戶受保護的推文 @

宣傳此推文

封鎖

  • 發送包含位置的推文

    你可以從網路和透過第三方應用程式,在推文中加入位置資訊,例如你的城市或確切位置。你隨時可以選擇刪除推文位置記錄。 了解更多

    你的列表

    建立新的列表


    須少於 100 個字,可選內容

    隱私

    複製連結到推文

    嵌入這則推文

    Embed this Video

    複製以下的程式碼,將此推文加到你的網站。 了解更多

    複製以下的程式碼,將此影片加到你的網站。 了解更多

    嗯,連接伺服器時出現了問題。

    如果在網站或應用程式中嵌入 Twitter 內容,即表示你同意 Twitter 開發人員合約和開發人員政策。

    預覽

    你看到此廣告的原因

    登入 Twitter

    · 忘記了密碼?
    還沒有帳戶嗎? 註冊 »

    註冊 Twitter

    還沒有用 Twitter?立即申請,當自己關心的事情一有消息,馬上獲得第一手資訊。

    註冊
    已經擁有帳戶? 登入 »

    雙向 (傳送與接收) 短代碼:

    國家 代碼 有關客戶
    美國 40404 (任意)
    加拿大 21212 (任意)
    英國 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    巴西 40404 Nextel, TIM
    海地 40404 Digicel, Voila
    愛爾蘭 51210 Vodafone, O2
    印度 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    印尼 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    義大利 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » 查看其他國家/地區的簡訊簡碼

    確認

     

    歡迎來到首頁!

    你將在這個時間軸花費大部分的時間,掌握你所關心事物的即時消息。

    不是你想看的推文?

    將滑鼠游標停留在個人資料相片上方並點擊「跟隨中」按鈕,即可取消跟隨任何帳戶。

    用簡單的方式表達千言萬語

    當你看到喜愛的推文時,只要點選愛心圖示,就能向推文作者表達你的喜愛。

    傳達訊息

    轉推是你與跟隨者分享推文的最快速方式。只要點選該圖示,即可立即發送該推文。

    加入對話

    透過回覆表達你對任何推文的想法。尋找你熱衷的主題並立即參與其中。

    得知最新消息

    立即得知人們正在討論的話題。

    取得喜愛事物的更多資訊

    跟隨更多帳戶,取得你所關心主題的即時消息。

    發掘正在發生的新鮮事

    立即查看任何主題的最新對話。

    絕不錯過任何新聞

    在事件發生的同時,立即獲取最佳報導。

    1. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      15/ a reminder from Obama executive order https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/29/statement-president-actions-response-russian-malicious-cyber-activity …: "sanctions" are not the same thing in the order as "expulsions" or "closures". Sanctions were what everyone was used to and expected. The expulsions and closures were unexpected and what FBI asked about.pic.twitter.com/uoauw7lZq5

      1 replies 26 則轉推 42 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    2. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      16/ after clause on Kislyak-Flynn conversation, Mueller indictment stated that Flynn called [Kushner] to report on Kislyak call, including their "discussion of the U.S. Sanctions", though, as noted above, the word "sanctions" does not occur in the 302.pic.twitter.com/LQ3wiQ3MNY

      1 replies 27 則轉推 38 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    3. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      17/ my own interpretation (without huge confidence) is that Flynn, as instructed (and quite reasonably) asked Kislyak to let new admin look at things and, in a general sense, not to escalate, but expected some sore of reciprocal action. On specifics of expulsion + closures, Flynn

      1 replies 20 則轉推 36 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    4. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      18/ would, without question, have wanted to see what Obama admin had done (rather than rely on Kislyak) and to get instructions before commenting to Kislyak on the issues of expulsion and closure which the FBI agents later asked him about.

      1 replies 19 則轉推 36 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    5. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      19/ from the 302 - and this is counterintuitive and requires watching the pea very closely - it doesn't appear that FBI agents actually asked Flynn about "sanctions" (which they might not have distinguished from "expulsions" and "closures".)

      2 replies 21 則轉推 35 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    6. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      20/ Dec 30: Putin saucily decided not to reciprocate with expulsions, but to invite US representatives in Moscow to a party (or similar). Kislyak, trying to build bridges with new admin, called Flynn to say that Russian restraint was due to Flynn's call. Flynn called transition.pic.twitter.com/3EoocPwUUi

      1 replies 20 則轉推 37 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    7. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      21/ 302: agents asked Flynn about Kislyak's follow up call to say that Russia had decided not to escalate. In his best imitation of Hillary (or Comey), Flynn implausibly said that "it was possible but he didn't remember".pic.twitter.com/x64HfWZ553

      2 replies 26 則轉推 36 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    8. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      22/ Hillary and Comey each said they "did not remember" for hundreds of questions and FBI/DOJ just shrugged their shoulders. However, when Flynn (implausibly) said the same, FBI charged that he "falsely stated that he did not remember a follow-up conversation", one of 2 counts.pic.twitter.com/td0guDCYWh

      4 replies 54 則轉推 70 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    9. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      23/ on Jan 12, someone in Resistance cabal told David Ignatius that Flynn had talked to Kislyak on Dec 29 http://archive.is/IFfZl  - a huge sensation since Steele Dossier had been published on Jan 10 following leaks from Comey-Brennan-Clapper cabal.pic.twitter.com/NsSM1nHS2v

      1 replies 29 則轉推 39 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
    10. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      24/ Ignatius speculated on possible violation of Logan Act - a ludicrous conceit concocted by Sally Yates. Ignatius' mention of Logan Act is thus slight (but only slight) pointer towards DOJ or FBI origin of leak.

      3 replies 27 則轉推 40 個喜歡
      顯示此對話串
      Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月20日

      25/ on Jan 14, WH spox John Earnest didn't see any problem in principle, that "incoming national security adviser may have need to contact representative of foreign government" despite lurid headline: "WH: We Didn’t Coordinate Flynn Call to RussAmbassador https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/14/white-house-we-didnt-coordinate-flynn-call-to-russian-ambassador.html …pic.twitter.com/WobHIAGp1y

      下午9:21 - 2018年12月20日
      • 25 次轉推
      • 35 個喜歡
      • Elena Evdokimova Uncle Jeffie Malinda Davis Jonathan 'Super elite'Adams❌ Abigail B 🌟🌟🌟 🇺🇸RUSHian MAGA Dittos Patriot ⚓️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Wyatt Earp Powerglobal Cheryl Austin
      1 replies 25 則轉推 35 個喜歡
        1. 新對話
        2. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 2018年12月21日

          26/ Obama had obligation to notify incoming admin of expulsions or even to consult. But maybe Obama didn't notify Trump team because they planned to surveille how Russia contacted transition. Would untoward backchannel be revealed? In fact, Russia contacted Flynn, proper channel.

          7 replies 53 則轉推 68 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        3. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          27/ these Flynn events are discussed in Mueller Report 236 pdf. Mueller fails to disclose that Obama admin appears to have notified Russia of sanctions on Dec 28, one day prior to 2 pm Dec 29 announcement, that Kislyak texted Flynn on Dec 28.pic.twitter.com/w0LDuUbF6K

          1 replies 3 則轉推 3 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        4. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          28/ in my interpretation of sequence set out above, it appeared to me that Kislyak-Flynn conversation took place prior to Flynn being aware of terms of Obama admin announcement (~2:15 pm), but Mueller indicates that call was in evening of Dec 29pic.twitter.com/NL6euF9syU

          1 replies 1 則轉推 1 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        5. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          29/ incoming Trump admin didn't want the departing Obama admin to escalate tensions as a sort of parting booby trap. Trump is also reported to have interpreted Obama's action as an attempt to "delegitimize election" - an interpretation that seems quite reasonable in retrospectpic.twitter.com/Hwo7ZUb4jh

          1 replies 5 則轉推 5 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        6. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          30/ as is Flynn called Kislyak and asked that Russia not make the situation worse. Recognizing that there was a new incoming administration, Russia decided not to escalate.pic.twitter.com/sonGZh7p2J

          1 replies 1 則轉推 1 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        7. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          31/ on Dec 31, Kislyak called Flynn to convey that Russia had decided not to escalate tensions.pic.twitter.com/QuKTwhjKKw

          1 replies 0 則轉推 1 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        8. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          32/ description of events thus far in Mueller Report more or less follows Indictment. Now something new from Mary McCord's interview. FBI already had open "investigation of Flynn based on his relationship with Russian government". His contacts with Kislyak were "key component"pic.twitter.com/nB2algdfZx

          1 replies 2 則轉推 1 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        9. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          33/ on what predicate did FBI open investigation into Flynn's "relationship with Russian government"? When did they open investigation? Did they have surveillance on Flynn? For how long?

          4 replies 5 則轉推 8 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        10. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 4月20日

          34/ McCord's evidence suggests that story about Flynn's discussion with Kislyak being incidentally picked up during routine surveillance of Kislyak is a legend. It seems more likely that they were surveilling Flynn and pick-up of conversation was NOT incidental.

          2 replies 13 則轉推 22 個喜歡
          顯示此對話串
        11. 對話結束

      看來要一段時間讀取資料。

      Twitter 可能已超出負載,或發生暫時性的小問題。請再試一次,或造訪 Twitter 狀態以取得更多資訊。

        推廣推文

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • 關於
        • 說明中心
        • 條款
        • 私隱政策
        • Cookies
        • 廣告資訊