3. Given the folly of the British government over Iraq and Libya, and its undoubted misleading of the public over Iraq, it is perfectly reasonable to suspect it of doing the same thing again. Some of us also do not forget the blatant lying over Suez, and indeed the Gulf of Tonkin twitter.com/thestarwormwoo
Conversation
Replying to
With any alleged crime, motive is a prime consideration when looking for suspects.
The only thing that could prevent Assad’s march to total victory in Syria is intervention by the US/the West.
Why would he use CWs during the End Game?
He may have, but we need proof.
1
7
Replying to
They failed to find any WMDs in Iraq but I rather suspect that they'll "find" some evidence linking these chemical attacks to Assad/Russia this time. Hoping it'll both restore a modicum of public confidence in our spooks and justify a war. Two wins at the price of one "find".
Replying to
"given their resources, you should accept the position of the US-UK-French security services"
Read an old English philosopher, John Locke, on why you should not accept the word of the Pope or even the King, on the Bible, but trust your own critical judgement, for fucks sake!
Not your biggest fan mate but this comment is spot on.totally agree with it.
Replying to
Most wars are based on lies then the lies get bigger -
do we need to teach this in primary school
Replying to
He Industrial Military complex is not designed to stop wars but to make and fight them.
1
Infact there just isn't enough memory space on twitter to list all the untruths, lies, falsehoods, misleading that governments are involved in!
1
If Thomas does not believe Governments do not lie to us he must be living in cloud cuckoo land
1