This is a bear pit. Experiment and replication of those experiments are fundamental to science. In certain sciences the ability to experiment is limited. That does not make them any less predictive and does not make them any less of a science e.g. astronomy, cosmology, geology
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Another interesting reference: https://blog.pubpeer.com/publications/EE46E14F6AA97049928835DBC6B908#46 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
How do they "over-rate" peer review? They simply mention it is a feature of modern science, rather than act as if it doesn't exist as you have been
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
From Nature magazine a few years ago (the scientific periodical bible)pic.twitter.com/nETbtpLII4
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
That article hardly negates the peer review process. It warns that there may be flaws but that’s about it. The medication you take is based on peer reviewed science. You seem ok with that. Just when it doesn’t suit you do you criticise.
- Još 15 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.