Yes, because each listens to and responds to the other's point. That's the difference between a debate and an argument. An argument is a repeated restating of one's own belief or attack on the opponents belief.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
"You don't believe in 2,999 gods, and I don't believe in Just one more." Priceless!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If we destroyed all the history books we couldn't write those again, and they're factual.
-
History is factual, but if we lose the books, we lose the knowledge without a way to recreate it. The scientific rules are descriptions of relationships that are ongoing, so always there to be refound in the same way.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Science is constantly proven and disproven. Science is theory. I never forced my kids to believe in God. You have to want to believe to have faith. You don't gain faith by being forced to believe.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I like both guys explaining the reasons. However, they didn’t go very deep. Ricky agreed with the metaphysical dilemma he faces. He only replied with a materialist belief. They discussed different categories of epistemologies. I’d be interested in a deeper exchange.
-
That was pretty cool.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Love your quickness on debate
@rickygervais Loved the ending... Quick, Witty, hilarious, loves all animals




you could of been Noah in a past life 
#justathoughtHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
He knows his stuff, he doesn't say anything unless he can back it up!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.