I love to dogpile on Sarsour as much as anyone else, but I assume this has something to do with the way white women in Alabama voted this week. That seems like a fairly legitimate topic to confront. No?
-
-
-
(1) Stats across the entire country are not the stats for Alabama. (2) I realize a lot of evangelical white women votes for Moore for religious reasons rather than racial. (3) Nonetheless, I think it's naive to think that ethnonationalism was not a substantial factor in Alabama.
-
It’s not about Alabama. It’s about trump voters without taking into consideration that plenty are pro life and against trump or vice versa.
-
Was the Women's March only about abortion? I thought sexual assault and general misogyny were part of it as well. Primarily in the case of Trump, who has historically been wishy-washy on abortion, but ironclad on being a pig.
-
I believe it was the main point.
-
I mean, they list "ending violence first, even before reproductive rights.pic.twitter.com/OtT5BHYAqS
-
I may be wrong but that’s what we were sold.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right-Wingers are going to eat this sht up!
-
This is the main course and dessert.
-
*whispers* I think they should confront white women, actually... and I won't explain myself whatsoever. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
Always a good starting point for feminism.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Can people decide already? I was told no now it’s yes.

-
Tweet unavailable
-
I will take your word for it and direct haters your way then.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.