It supposedly has to do with the Langerhans receptors in the mucosal tissue of the inner foreskin. By cutting them all off, there is potentially a lower risk of HIV. Or, they could just use condoms, which would ACTUALLY be effective
-
-
-
Exactly. One needed to use condoms anyway. That's over 99% of the protection.https://youtu.be/JbTdkWV89Ak?t=237 …
-
Right! So...condoms, or condoms AND cutting off the most erogenous part of your body.pic.twitter.com/S1JpAKibxT
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But if men knew/understood that circumcision means less sex (less often and less experience), they would certainly NOT get amputated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.