This, by the way, is why we need to punch Nazis instead of giving them pundit slots on the news.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's interesting to think of all the horrible things they /wouldn't/ publish a defense of in their Opinion section. But, heck, I don't know, maybe they /would/ put out a sincere take on how great it is to eat babies for "public scrutiny and debate".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tune in for the next installment of
@nytimes 593-part op-ed series: Mein KampfThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems unfair that they didn't guve Timothy McVeigh the same space. He and Cotton had the same ideology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Imagine thinking that "we should have a police state" is something that needs public scrutiny and debate.
-
So, I get it, and I hate this guy, but aren’t we better off knowing who he really is now rather than not knowing? I dont know that giving him this platform legitimizes him more than the state of Arkansas already has
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly! Some things should never, ever be given a platform. Period.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But, they didn't scrutinize it or debate it. They just published it, cloaking it in their admittedly tattered credibility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We'll said!


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hate Tom Cotton? Please consider following
@DanWhitCongress who is running against him!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.