Maybe you could mention how unconstitutional it was to not even hold a confirmation hearing for Merrick Garland, too.
I'm abt to speak on senate floor abt how ridiculous Dems move to filibuster Gorsuch is considering his outstanding qualifications for scotus
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More ridiculous than you not even having a hearing for Garland? You are a hypocrite and only care about power.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about Merrick Garland's outstanding qualifications?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chuck, this is dishonest. Merrick Garland was outstanding and you denied him a hearing. Gorauch plagiarized. That's not "outstanding."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You indeed know ridiculous with your treatment of Judge Garland, you two-faced hypocrite.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
you seemed ok with it when it was Merrick Garland. What changed from last year to now?
-
Garland had a hearing on November 9th, he lost.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If Dems are "ridiculous" for filibustering Gorsuch, what do you call Republicans who outright obstructed Garland? I used to respect you ...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.