Wait, did you say "pick person who interpret law as Congress intended"? Not as it is written? Talk about judicial activism.
For ppl who want more info abt WH mtg It was good discussion I told Pres most imp pt is pick person who interprets law as Congress intended
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait, wait, wait...what about the Constitution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, the most important thing is for them to interpret law as the laws themselves intended, not at Congressional whims.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please explain how Congress intended Senate to obstruct nominee for 300 days. You even quoted Hamilton on this.
#HYPOCRISYpic.twitter.com/haWDlzIpa0
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like Merrick Garland?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
OK, how about Merrick Garland?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Merrick Garland is qualified in this regard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wow, what about as the founders intended?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ChuckGrassley isn't that judicial activism that you 'abhor'? Funny how u want 2 do ur job now. Retire already.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.