This is a small percentage of the total, why are you misrepresenting the facts to the American people?
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It’s a “record” because it’s a small fraction of a MASSIVE, partisan paper trail going back decades. You’re omitting the damning parts of his record you don’t want voters to see. Iowans understand your scam.
-
This proud Iowa voter see what’s going on and am disgusted with the hypocrisy, complicity and morally bankrupt Congress Republicans! They all think they are above the law including their Swamp King! It’s all about their party and what suits them- to heck with the rest! Cheaters!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The fact that you haven’t released all the records show the Republicans haven’t even read them & your party is yet again negligent. Let Congress
#DoTheirHomework Release all his records. Full stop. Stop hiding things. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
With all due respect, you are lying, sir. You have been asked many times to assist getting K's complete information. There's a huge gap of missing records and these need review prior to his confirmation.
You know this!
Which makes me ask, what does Putin have on you, Chuck? -
@ChuckGrassley probably took rubles from@NRA like the rest of these@GOP co-conspirators.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
200,000 pages to review in 1.5 weeks? Yeah, that should be plenty of time! Also, what about the 1 million+ pages that are still hidden from view? And does any of this change the appropriateness of Trump nominating a judge who will likely decide the future of his presidency?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Review them ALL. Cherry picked records do not show entire story on him and you damn well know it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.